uSwitch.com Mobile Phone News

BlackBerry PlayBook: should RIM just cut its losses?

Comment

Posted at 2:39pm by

To say the past week has been bad for Research in Motion (RIM) is as big an understatement as suggesting Facebook users aren’t too impressed with the recent myriad changes to the social network.

The BlackBerry-maker revealed last week that a mere 200,000 units of its PlayBook were sold in its second financial quarter. And earlier this week, the company that assembles the slate, Quanta Computer, said it was cutting 1,000 staff on its production because orders have fallen back drastically.

Blackberry Playbook

In fact, things are so bad that sources claimed that just 100,000 PlayBooks had been shipped in the third quarter. RIM has slashed its forecasts for PlayBook sales, which initially stood at a highly optimistic five million back in April.

Yes, the company has promised the much-needed native email update next month. But then it did also previously say that self-same software boost would be out in the summer. Last time we checked, October wasn’t the balmiest of months.

It all begs the question, just why is RIM persisting with its tablet? It’s clearly gone unloved by the general public, a victim of the iPad’s success, Android Honeycomb tablets offering a much better range of apps and RIM’s own abject failure to ensure it worked perfectly on release.

The company could learn a thing or two from HP. Shelving the TouchPad garnered it plenty of goodwill and garnered some good PR out of what should by rights have been a disastrous story.

HP TouchPad UI and multitasking

Because although RIM is not exactly doing great right now, it’s actually not doing terribly in other areas. It’s still making money and still shifting sufficient smartphones to be profitable, even if they’re not selling in the same numbers as years gone by.

But the PlayBook is becoming a worrying distraction. Especially when fighting the smartphone war against the ever-growing threat of Android and iOS is vital to the Canadian company’s survival.

Shelving the PlayBook would have been easier had RIM been able to release QNX-backed smartphones sooner. Because these next-generation devices have been delayed, the PlayBook stands alone as the only device using the impressive operating system. Scrapping it now would mean the OS had essentially failed to impress.

It would have made sense to release a phone using the OS first. As it stands, now the situation means RIM are stuck supporting a device that the gadget-buying public just isn’t interested in buying.

QNX means RIM won’t pull its tablet just yet. But if it had any sense, it would slash the price and bring the curtain down on a device which was always destined to struggle.

More news on: BlackBerry, Tablets, BlackBerry Playbook

6 Comments

  • Fast Eddie, 23rd September 2011.

    All first devices suck. Look at the first Android tablets. They sucked bad. BlackBerry 2 could be amazing, though. Nothing wroing with QNX. And androids apps will get the casual fans in.

    Reply
  • Boneflute, 23rd September 2011.

    "It would have made sense to release a phone using the OS first"

    Exactly.

    Who would pair a QNX tablet with an OS6 device ?!?

    But maybe they wanted to send a signal to the corporate market. In that case I would have sold the tablet only through IT departments which are competent in configuring, upgrading, etc.

    Yes, I know, I can get the PB now and QNX phone later. As a consumer there's little chance, but an IT department can plan well in advance.

    As it is, the PB languished unconfigured in retail stores, no handset in sight.

    But I guess it's too late now, and they will produce a trickle of PB's until next year's QNX phones.

    They probably sold 100-200k more this way, but they tarnished their image and it will take quite a few spotless releases to erase that.

    One they did, the new OS 7.
    The new Bold is not only fast, slick, etc, it's arguably "the most aesthetically compelling phone ever created".

    (I don't say this myself, here's the link:
    http://gearburn.com/2011/09/review-blackberry-bold-9900-tragically-beautiful/)

    Two to go.

    I root for them, I'd love to see them succeed.

    Reply
  • Nick, 23rd September 2011.

    I think no need to shelf PlayBook. With Native email, MDM, Android app support and other cool native apps the PlayBook will be a whole different product.

    The business uptake will also takeoff once the MDM and native email is ready, consumer uptake will improve a lot with the Android apps and native apps availability. Plus...with the QNX device of future the dev life cycle and requirements will overlap quite a bit with tablet and devices for faster product timelines...but of course time will tell :)

    Reply
  • ALLEN V TRAFNY, 23rd September 2011.

    Other than 3 changes I would Iike to see UBS port,Micro card and redesign of the turn/on button on the top other wise this pocket size very powerful light weight hand held computer works great.

    I purchased the PlayBook to use in my seasonal cottage that does not have a TV or Internet so the PlayBook works perfect with the BlackBerry Bridge app through my phone, I can read up to the minute NEWS or read my Gmail,FaceBook accounts so people what POOP whats else do you need.

    Reply
  • Kekus, 23rd September 2011.

    How many of these analysts have actually used a Playbook before commenting on how bad they are. I've used both the iPad and the Playbook. I now only use the Playbook. What RIM really sucks at is marketing their products and their strengths. So simple my 4 & 6 year olds have masterd the Playbook. Already lots of apps (accept I can't seem to find the farting apps or beer drinking apps yet - oh well).

    Reply
  • J Erictin, 23rd September 2011.

    You honestly think what HP did with their TouchPad was good? CEO has since been fired and ALL the press and analyst commentary has been hypercritical of HP pulling out shortly after the TouchPad launched. HP's story makes the case for why RIM should NOT pull out of the tablet market. RIM needs to focus on devices and tablets using its new O/S, and cut ties with the developer-unfriendly old O/S.

    Reply

Add your comment