uSwitch.com Broadband News

Disconnection of file sharers contravenes spirit of Digital Britain

News

Posted at 12:21pm by

Future illustration

TalkTalk were first in line yesterday with a broadside that posited that disconnection could actually be a violation of human rights. Strong words, indeed. But since then they’ve been joined in the chorus of disapproval by BT and Virgin Media whose pronouncements tally pretty closely with TalkTalk’s.

Meanwhile, non-broadband providers haven’t held back either. The Open Rights Group dubbed the bolt-from-the-blue change of heart a knee jerk reaction and questioned whether disconnection was really compatible with the grand plan to allow all Britons universal broadband access.

Computer mouse

We’re inclined to agree with them. After all, the kernel of the Digital Britain scheme is the notion that broadband is now as essential to life as water and heating. Moreover, the government also claimed that those who didn’t have a broadband connection were hugely disadvantaged in the job market and in life.

If this is true – and we’ve no doubt that it is - then surely cutting people off just for illegal downloading is a hugely disproportionate punishment?

More news on: Future developments

1 comment

  • Jennifer, 27th August 2009.

    how can any responsible article state 'then surely cutting people off JUST for illegal downloading is a hugely disproportionate punishment'?

    Illegal filesharing is ruining the film and music industries, which is why there is a dearth of new bands and the tv is full of repeats and other assorted rubbish.

    Illegal filesharing is NOT a victimless crime. Everyone suffers. If people don't want to be cut off the answer is very simple - STOP ILLEGAL FILESHARING. It's their choice. It's time to stop being so namby pamby. Once a few people are cut off the rest will soon get the idea. Like I said, it's their choice. Musicians and film makers have suffered long enough. they don't have the same luxury of choice.

    Reply

Add your comment