uSwitch.com Broadband News

Rural communities 'could pay more for broadband'

News

Posted at 12:11pm by

Broadband Coverage

Plans to bring 2Mb broadband to the majority of the country could result in higher internet costs for people who live in rural areas.

According to This is Devon, the government's intention to deliver universal super-fast internet to the UK relates only to speed and not cost.

The regional news portal revealed that a government spokesman has admitted there is a possibility that rural communities might have to pay for the additional costs incurred as a result of the roll-out.

Such a move could mean that people who live in the countryside are faced with unfairly higher costs for having faster broadband than those in urban areas, the Country Land and Business Association warned.

However, the hope is that increased competition among broadband operators will limit any disparity between pricing because of a customer's location.

"We would be looking for network service providers to offer a range of choice which should keep prices down," the government spokesman commented.

More news on: Broadband coverage, Future developments

1 comment

  • E C Smith, 19th August 2009.

    BT are the only supplier of broadband in the area I live (rural Scotland). There is insufficient capacity at the exchange, 2 people I know of are waiting for broadband, which "may take up to 2 1/2 years"! Although it's supposed to be 2Mb, we actually get 0.5Mb, and the monthly cost is more than double that charged by other companies in large villages (5 miles away).
    It's not good enough!
    We have no mobile coverage here, and need to be able to have broadband available to anyone who wants it. They did it in rural Ireland, there's no reason why it shouldn't be done here or any other rural area of the UK. The government isn't doing what it promised.

    Reply

Add your comment